What I find odd is that anti-IDists challenge the math of IDists, yet expect everyone to accept their assertion that chance is a sufficient explanation without any mathematical model whatsoever.
It seems to me that questioning IDers on the accuracy of their probability analysis is rather hypocritical when one offers no probability analysis whatsoever to support one’s original contention that chance is a sufficient explanation.
Mote, eye, beam.
Monday, October 19, 2009
This Comment Nails It