READER STEPHEN CLARK has a question:
A simple question asked in the context of recent events and prior discussions of the Geneva Accords: Why hasn't the International Committee of the Red Cross demanded access to the Israeli soldiers taken in Gaza and in northern Israel? The same could be asked for any other relevant organizations as well as governments who've recently been concerned with the treatment of non-uniformed combatants.
Certainly the soldier taken into Gaza is the responsibility of the quasi-Palestinian state and surely deserving of Geneva protections. Hezbollah while not a state or quasi-state has at least as much stature as Al Qaeda and it seems that the international community believes that Geneva extends to Al Qaeda's representatives; so, why would it not also extend to uniformed soldiers held by Hezbollah which, I believe, has declared itself to be at war with the state of Israel.
Because, of course, the Geneva Conventions only apply against Israel, and the United States, never to their benefit. You can look it up.
posted at 07:40 AM by Glenn Reynolds
Saturday, July 15, 2006
Geneva For Thee, But Not For Me
Instapundit highlights a very good point: