Here's one:
10. Sen. Obama, this question is about global warming, something about which you urge extreme action to fight. You criticize President Bush for going to war in Iraq, even though all 16 intelligence agencies felt with "high confidence" that Saddam Hussein possessed stockpiles of WMD. Critics of Bush say he cherry-picked the intelligence. Hundreds, if not thousands, of scientists consider concerns about global warming overblown. Isn't there far more dissent among credible scientists about global warning than there was among American intelligence analysts about Iraq? If so, as to the studies on global warming, why can't you be accused of cherry-picking?
1 comment:
But...but....Anthropromorphic global warming is the TWOOF!!!
It's the UTTER TWOOF!
How can you nit-pick with logic when things are obviously the TWOOF, because I agree with them, instead of that nasty war?!?!?!
Post a Comment