Tuesday, January 25, 2011

One Should Never Hire An Atheist. Because It Tells You Something About Him.

Or so says Richard Dawkins.

Instapundit comments:
RICHARD DAWKINS ON THAT KENTUCKY RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION CASE. All I can say is, Dawkins’ views on what the law should be bear little or no resemblance to what the law actually is. Interesting to see the BoingBoing commenters pushing back. I like this one: “I can’t help but think of the equally-religious beliefs held by adherents of particular operating systems, text editors, and programming languages.”

And this: “Oh, just come out and say it, you want to discriminate against a certain class of people even though there is no real objective logical reason to do so. You get an ick factor. Which is eminently stupid.”

And as far as I can tell, Dawkins is going out of his way to suggest — without quite saying — that a man who writes about the Big Bang as possibly divinely inspired is nonetheless some sort of Young Earth Creationist. But here’s what Gaskell says in the very passage truncated by Dawkins: “I have a lot of respect for people who hold this view because they are strongly committed to the Bible, but I don’t believe it is the interpretation the Bible requires of itself, and it certainly clashes head-on with science.”

Dawkins seems to have completely misrepresented Gaskell to buttress his argument. Really, one would expect better from someone devoted to reason above all.
Dawkins is not devoted to reason above all. He's devoted to atheism above all.

There's a big difference.

The full text of one of the comments quoted by Instapundit is:
Oh, just come out and say it, you want to discriminate against a certain class of people even though there is no real objective logical reason to do so. You get an ick factor. Which is eminently stupid. Competence is by definition the ability to get the job done in a satisfactory or better than satisfactory manner. If the person is competent, but somehow throws you off personally because of cultural predilections, that's frankly a problem and a weakness of your comfort level. Imagine a world where you could hire and fire based on that. I would certainly like to see what you'd have to say when someone refuses to hire an Atheist, because "it tells you something about him."

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Aw man, the amount of herp-derp and navel-gazing in that post is off the charts.

Do they think they really need to spend so much trying to rationalize their rejection of something so... obvious?

Stephen R said...

"Dawkins is not devoted to reason above all. He's devoted to atheism above all. There's a big difference."

Yup. That, precisely, is the distinction I frequently make between "atheist" and "antitheist". Dawkins is an antitheist.

Most atheists I've ever met (myself included) are not opposed to religious faith, per se. We don't *agree* with it, sure, but...

...Well, it's kind of like the computer OS metaphor: Sure, I think Macs are better; but if you like Windows or Linux, what do I care?