E.J. Dionne, a liberal's liberal and often a leading indicator of the liberal line, twists himself into a pretzel defending President Obama's plan to tax charitable deductions. Here is his indictment of the unfairness of it all under the current tax structure (update* - logic taken from President Obama's p;ress conference:
Obama's proposal is based on a sound intuition: Do we really believe it's fair that when a married couple with a taxable income of $50,000 gives $1,000 to charity, they get a tax benefit of $150, while a couple earning $1 million making exactly the same contribution gets back $350? Is it fair that the higher-income couple also gets a bigger tax advantage on their mortgage payments?
The value of the deductions is currently worth more to the higher-income couple because they pay taxes at a higher rate. Obama wouldn't even close the whole gap. Applied to this example, his 28 percent cap would still let the wealthier couple deduct $280.
Note that if Obama merely raised income tax rates on the highly-taxed rich couple, it would get more unfair -- to the low-taxed couple. Hence the need to add even more taxes on the rich couple. reducing their deduction.
One cynical definition of an intellectual is a person willing to believe something preposterous and congratulate himself on his sophistication.
Update: I missed Obama's mentioning of this logic. To be honest, I couldn't watch the whole thing for boredom, so took some breaks.
Civilization, in every generation, must be defended from barbarians. The barbarians outside the gate, the barbarians inside the gate, and the barbarian in the mirror...
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Fairness
According to liberals:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment