Interesting That They Would Rip Off Wiker Wholesale, But Turn Around And Misrepresent Behe, Who Is On Wiker's Side Of The Issue

I continue to be singularly unimpressed with Darwinist's basic honesty and ability to say anything substantive against ID. The latest example detailed here. I'd seen the list referred to a day or two ago, and found it quite curious that it would mention a number of books that could only have been written and believed in in an intellectual culture where Darwinism held sway, and then go on to inaccurately trash a book arguing against Darwinism. Totally inconsistent. And now, it turns out, a flagrant rip-off.