tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8483622.post7056816057290144186..comments2024-02-29T20:00:59.902-08:00Comments on Cartago Delenda Est: Self-RefutationMatteohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05393908406875742989noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8483622.post-28491971264296567172010-06-12T13:01:03.762-07:002010-06-12T13:01:03.762-07:00"Interesting statement. It proposes the exist..."<i>Interesting statement. It proposes the existence of an interpretive/evaluative principle which is not defendable using the scientific method. And hence there is no reason to listen to it.</i>"<br /><br />Notice, too, that among the explicit and implicit assertions the fellow is making is the assertion that there exists an objective, universal binding, moral obligation to "follow the scientific method" (of which there is actually no such thing, in any event) in one's defense of one's propostitions.<br /><br />Really? Whence comes this objective, universal binding, moral obligation in a world merely of matter in motion?Ilíonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8483622.post-15452907544634842582010-06-12T12:15:57.964-07:002010-06-12T12:15:57.964-07:00I dare anyone to make that argument within arm'...I dare anyone to make that argument within arm's length of me. I have a rather physical refutation that argues I do indeed exist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8483622.post-26553987117865358172010-06-12T05:21:51.778-07:002010-06-12T05:21:51.778-07:00oops "Invisible Gardener"oops "Invisible Gardener"Ilíonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8483622.post-50250278556018536982010-06-12T05:21:28.418-07:002010-06-12T05:21:28.418-07:00These chuckle-heads probably think Anthiony Flew&#...These chuckle-heads probably think Anthiony Flew's "Invisible Gradner" (question-begging) analogy is a telling refutation of Christianity.Ilíonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.com